The battle to launch USDH has drawn proposals from some of the biggest names in stablecoin infrastructure, each with different issuance models, revenue structures, and growth strategies. While Paxos and Ethena are leading the conversation on CT, prediction markets like Polymarket show strong odds in favor of Native Markets.
The race for USDH is heating up.
Multiple stablecoin issuers have submitted competing proposals to launch USDH, each with distinct approaches to issuance, revenue sharing, and user incentives.
The table below compares key differences across issuance models, revenue allocation to Hyperliquid, and incentive structures offered by each candidate.

Each contender brings different strengths to the table, from regulatory compliance and market experience to technical innovation and ecosystem integration. The second comparison examines their track records, regulatory status, and core competencies.

Polymarket Odds on USDH Proposals
The battle for the USDH ticker is heating up, with Polymarket prediction markets painting a very different picture than social media sentiment suggests.
On Crypto Twitter, the most popular proposals appear to be Paxos, with its PayPal and Venmo integrations, and Ethena, which has a strong track record with USDe and has pledged to return 95% of net revenue back to Hyperliquid.
However, the Polymarket prediction market tells a different story. Trading volume has reached nearly $2 million ($1.7M so far), and the frontrunner is clearly Native Markets with 71% probability, followed by Paxos (23%), Ethena (5%), Sky (2%), and Frax/Agora at under 1%.

The market resolves based on Hyperliquid's on-chain validator vote on September 14.
The startup, Native Markets, founded by Max Fiege, Anish Agnihotri, and MC Lader, was created specifically to build the optimal stablecoin for Hyperliquid's vision of becoming "a blockchain to house all finance." Their DeFi-native expertise appears to resonate with the ecosystem.
Since the decision ultimately rests on validator voting, Native Markets may have a structural advantage.

The figure below from @ArthuronHL shows the voting weight distribution of each team.

According to the USDH Vote Tracking Dashboard by @AIC_Hugo, Native Market currently leads with 33.73%, followed by Paxos (11.52%) and Ethena (8.25%)

The outcome of the USDH vote will shape Hyperliquid’s next chapter, deciding not only who issues its native stablecoin but also how value flows back to the ecosystem. While Polymarket odds currently favor Native Markets, the validator vote will be the final arbiter.
Reference
The official Twitter accounts, founder accounts where available, and direct links to each proposal are attached here for further reading.
Paxos
Twitter: https://x.com/Paxos
Proposal V1: https://paxoslabs.com/blog/usdh
Proposal V2: https://paxoslabs.com/blog/usdh-v2
Sky (makerdao)
Twitter: https://x.com/SkyEcosystem
Co-founder: https://x.com/RuneKek
Proposal: https://x.com/RuneKek/status/1965194847855272175
Bastion
Twitter: https://x.com/BastionPlatform
CEO: https://x.com/nassyweazy
Proposal: https://www.bastion.com/blog/usdh-with-bastion
FAQ: https://x.com/nassyweazy/status/1964906488331186682
Agora
Twitter: https://x.com/withAUSD
CEO: https://x.com/Nick_van_Eck
Proposal: https://x.com/Nick_van_Eck/status/1964732654969852159
Native market
Founder: https://x.com/fiege_max
TLDR: https://x.com/fiege_max/status/1965165267597885944
Proposal: https://nativemarkets.substack.com/p/expanded-proposal-native-markets
Frax
Twitter: https://x.com/fraxfinance
Founder: https://x.com/samkazemian
Proposal: https://x.com/fraxfinance/status/1964130779253891317
Proposal Update: https://x.com/fraxfinance/status/1965099708353048707
Ethena
Twitter: https://x.com/ethena_labs
Founder: https://x.com/gdog97_
Proposal: https://mirror.xyz/0xF99d0E4E3435cc9C9868D1C6274DfaB3e2721341/vG9tVz8p6Da6vX8CiZ30A0CYM3wIiWlIBX6Zlj0qhQ8