PEPE0.00 -1.35%

TON3.17 -3.05%

BNB732.31 -1.02%

SOL177.66 -0.27%

XRP3.43 0.48%

DOGE0.24 3.00%

TRX0.32 -1.97%

ETH3563.39 -0.27%

BTC118179.88 0.48%

SUI3.78 -2.68%

Binance Alpha’s Top-Traded Token $BR Dumps Over 50%, Fueling Market Doubts and Criticism of Liquidity Mechanism

Binance Alpha faced another familiar flash crash as its star token BR’s price halved within 2 minutes, replaying the ZKJ collapse and sparking renewed doubts about Alpha’s liquidity mechanism.

On July 9, 2025, the Bedrock (BR) token, a top-traded token within Binance Alpha's incentivized trading program and a core component for efficiently farming points with minimal costs, experienced a dramatic collapse, dropping over 50% in value.

According to @ai_9684xtpa:

  • BR liquidity stayed above $60 million before the crash.

  • Within 100 seconds, 26 wallets pulled $47.59 million in liquidity almost simultaneously.

  • Followed by 16 wallets dumping tokens:

    • 3 wallets dumping over $1 million each.

    • 13 wallets dumping over $500,000 each.

  • Resulted in liquidity dropping to $14.56 million and a sharp price collapse.

Who Was Behind the Dump?

The dump does not appear to be orchestrated by the project team. Given the high risk and negative precedent set by the blatant ZKJ collapse, such an obvious move would be self-damaging. Additionally, the project’s main liquidity wallet still holds $4.685 million and remained inactive during the crash period since July 7.

The primary dumping activity came from three million-dollar-level wallets, all newly created about two weeks prior. These wallets transferred funds from exchanges between June 24 and June 28 before initiating large BR token positions, indicating a coordinated intent with a single capital source.

However, tracing these wallets is challenging due to the simplicity and uniformity of their capital sources.

The incident also highlights broader concerns about market trust and security. Crypto analyst ZachXBT criticized Circle’s handling of a recent $40 million USDC exploit.

This lack of rapid response in related stablecoin infrastructure compounds market uncertainty, indirectly affecting investor confidence in adjacent token ecosystems like Binance Alpha’s BR.

Binance Alpha’s Liquidity Mechanism Faces Growing Criticism

Following the BR token crash, crypto influencer @BroLeonAus highlighted longstanding risks in Binance Alpha’s “volume farming + liquidity draining” model. Early behaviors of projects like BR and AB—linear K-line charts, low fees, and continuous liquidity inflows—already indicated “point farming” tendencies. Their near-simultaneous flash crashes confirmed these concerns.

BroLeon criticized Binance Alpha’s point calculation rules for incentivizing projects to manufacture artificial activity and attract retail liquidity. By creating the illusion of “deep liquidity and low fees,” projects lure users as liquidity providers, then swiftly pull liquidity to dump tokens, leaving retail holders exposed.

He revealed that despite advising Bedrock’s team to implement third-party liquidity locks for user protection, no clear response was received, and cooperation stalled. While no proof ties the BR team directly to the dump, he faulted Binance’s wallet team for ignoring the evident design flaws.

Originally aimed at benefiting retail users, the platform has become vulnerable to exploitation, undermining trust. Without reforms to tie rewards to genuine, locked liquidity, the model risks repeated cycles of artificial growth followed by sudden crashes.

Bedrock’s Response to the Token Crash and Liquidity Concerns

Following the sharp price collapse, the Bedrock team issued an official statement acknowledging the significant market turmoil but emphasized that the project’s core liquidity pool remained mostly unaffected. They denied any involvement in manipulative practices or a rug pull, stressing their ongoing commitment to ecosystem stability.

In subsequent remarks, the team said they are closely monitoring developments and collaborating with Binance Alpha to improve liquidity safeguards. They urged users to rely on official updates and pledged to maintain transparency as they address potential risks moving forward.

Seeking the Truth Behind the BR Collapse

While the recent dump does not appear to be directly orchestrated by the Bedrock team, concerns about BR’s token risk have been raised well before the crash.

Influencers like @VietnamPenguin had already alerted the community days before the crash about inherent risks in BR’s tokenomics and liquidity incentives. He pointed out that "Guys, be very careful with $BR from Binance Alpha. There’s some clear manipulation going on right now."

In fact, as he predicted, “And then, one day, the same thing will happen as with $ZKJ: when the whales pull their liquidity again, but instead of another ‘pump,’ they’ll dump all their $BR into your LP.”

Compared to the proactive stance taken by the ZKJ team during their crisis, Bedrock’s response so far has been notably less forthcoming. Investors urgently need a clear, thorough investigation report from the project team to restore confidence. Such transparency is the key to moving forward. Blockflow will continue to monitor this story closely and keep readers updated on any new developments.

Passionate about AI and data, love exploring the Web3 world, sipping on bubble tea, and sharing insights with you.